BuildingBetterDataCenters

MicroLink designs, builds, owns, and operates data centers that reuse heat to create value for infrastructure.

MicroLink Data Centers

Every chip in
a data center
is a kettle.

Energy spent on cooling:40%Of the power a conventional data center draws.
Heat thrown away:$11MEvery year, per 100 MW of compute, at what a host pays for heat.
A kettle and a computer chip side by side, each with a percentage bar beneath it.
One idea, one image, one number
The answerMicroLink Data Centers

Four Problems We Solve

01
$2.2M
Heat the host buys, every year.
Money Saved
02
$5.3M
Cooling we never have to buy.
Cooling Avoided
03
2 100+
US sites nobody else counts as sites.
Sites Unlocked
04
6 months
From signature to first load.
Speed to Deployment
Dollar figures per year on a 20 MW siteNext: the pod that does it
Plant room with pumps and distribution pipework at dusk.
MicroLink
MicroLink pod
“MicroLink is doing something unique and special, and that does not happen all the time in the data center industry.”

Jumbi Edulbehram

Global Public Sector Director, NVIDIA Corporation

MicroLink energy and heat flow

What MicroLink does

01

MicroLink intelligently chooses and optimises energy input

Generation mix:4 sourcesGrid, solar, wind and battery per site.
Stranded power:UsedRenewable output that would be curtailed.
Grid upgrades:10 citiesMunicipal infrastructure conversations underway.

02

MicroLink increases rack density and shortens the power path

Distribution:800 V DCFewer conversion stages between connection and rack.
Build method:ModularSite work is connection, not construction.
Redundancy:N to 2NSet in the contract, not assumed.

03

MicroLink cools the silicon directly and closes the water loop

Cooling method:Direct to chipCold plates on the silicon, no room air path.
Loop separation:3 loopsChip, facility and rejection loops kept apart.
Water use:90% lessClosed loop, no evaporative make up.

04

MicroLink hands the heat back to the city around it

Heat recovered:85%Reused rather than rejected to the air.
Value to the host:$2.2MEvery year on a 20 MW site.
Equivalent to:4 000 homesThe heat a 20 MW site could serve.

The case

Five points that make the difference

01

Heat is a second revenue line

A conventional data centre throws its heat away. Next to a district heating network, that same heat has a buyer who is already paying for it in gas. On 20 MW of IT load, roughly $14M a year against the same capital.

It need not be taken as cash. The value can go back to the host as discounted heat, or be traded for a lower power price, or for grid capacity at a site otherwise years down an interconnection queue.

Cumulative heat revenue from 20 MW of IT load at PUE 1.12 and ERE 0.48, held flat with no escalator applied.

Cumulative heat revenue over a 15 year lease
Water use, closed loop against evaporative cooling

02

The water stays in the loop

Evaporative cooling is what makes a campus a water story in the local press. A closed loop with a dry cooler path removes the argument before it starts, which is the difference between a permit granted and a permit fought.

Measured peak daily water use, Vantage Data Centers Port Washington Wisconsin, closed loop against a comparable evaporative campus.

03

The workload is coming back off cloud

Enterprises are moving AI workloads out of public cloud and into infrastructure they own or co-locate, driven by cost at scale, data sovereignty rules and disaster recovery that cannot sit in one provider.

Illustrative. Share of enterprise AI workloads moving off public cloud into owned and co-located infrastructure over a ten year window.

Enterprise AI workloads moving off public cloud

04

Full stack architecture

One module, one heat exchanger, one control system, assembled at whatever scale the host facility and the sink can carry. A cabinet in a plant room and a 750 MW campus are the same product counted differently.

Four MicroLink deployment scales

05

Sites in development

Twelve sites in the portfolio, each an existing industrial facility with a heat sink already attached. We are working toward breaking ground on all of them.

  • Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaDistrict energy20 MW
  • Bethlehem, PennsylvaniaUniversity and utility15 MW
  • Massena, New YorkHydro and industrial60 MW
  • Brooklyn, New YorkWastewater15 MW
  • Princeton, New JerseyUniversity10 MW
  • New York StatePublic programme5 MW
  • Mansfield, OhioCampus development750 MW
  • San Jose, CaliforniaIndustrial host10 MW
United States site map

Eight of twelve shown. Frankfurt, Tokyo and two further US sites are at an earlier stage. Alongside these, we have continuing discussions on a public programme placing units in K to 12 schools, a global pod rollout across the bottling plants of a beverage manufacturer, and a number of university collaborations.

Talk to our Team

One electron, two jobs

Contact